Brokers urge law firms to prepare for proposed SRA changes to PII provision

Specialist professional indemnity insurance broker to the legal profession, QPI is calling for law firms to prepare for proposed SRA changes to PII provision, urging solicitors to seek specialist advice in advance.

Business leaders at QPI have highlighted the potential repercussions that the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) proposed changes to PII could have on the profession if adopted. They have warned that purchasing protection will no longer be a straightforward process.

The call for firms to act comes as the SRA revives proposals to introduce changes to the minimum terms and conditions via their consultation process, including cutting the minimum levels of insurance cover by significant amounts both in indemnity limit and scope of cover.

With over 20 years experience within the sector, Phil Edwards, Managing Director of QPI, is one of a select group of brokers invited by the Law Society to comment on the consultation.

He, said: “Solicitors should take steps now to seek out expert advice ahead of the potential introduction of far-reaching changes outlined in the consultation, ‘Protecting the users of legal services: balancing cost and access to legal services’.

“The proposals are more likely to get the go-ahead this time given the time and input that’s gone into this consultation. Firms need to work on the assumption these changes will happen. They need to be ready for it and fully prepared as these changes could most likely first impact those who have PII renewals in spring 2019 or thereafter.

“We’re urging law firms to act now in preparation.  Purchasing PII has become easier recently however it’s going to get harder because of the need to build cover more specifically designed for each individual firm. Solicitors should seek the right level of advice to help them navigate these proposed changes before they are introduced. Here at QPI we can offer extensive expertise, knowledge and guidance to help firms manage and minimise the impact of the proposed changes.”

Key proposals outlined in the consultation, which lasts until 15th June, include:

  • Revival of a proposal, previously rejected by the Legal Services Board, to reduce the minimum professional indemnity insurance cover from £2 million/£3 million to £500,000. Firms conducting conveyancing work would need £1 million cover for each claim.
  • Flexibility around who pays defence costs.
  • Doing away with the requirement for compulsory insurance to include cover for large commercial clients such as lenders in a conveyancing transaction.
  • Maintaining the need for a six year run-off period of insurance cover but with a £3 million cap for those needing conveyancing services cover and £1.5 million for other firms.

The SRA says changes could have a positive impact on premiums, encouraging a more competitive marketplace. It states over half of firms take out more than the minimum cover currently required and 98% of PII claims against law firms are valued at under £500,000.  The SRA estimate premium savings between 9-17% if the proposals are implemented.

Edwards added: “The market’s already competitive, a view highlighted by myself and fellow brokers who held talks with the Law Society about the consultation.  What drives the market is claims and claims costs; it’s what drives every insurance market. Reduce the claims costs and premiums will reflect this, risk management is the key in this market – not just tinkering with the policy wording.”

While the SRA has indicated the call for change is to improve access to legal services and cutting PII cover will potentially reduce insurance overheads, Richard Grayson, Head of QPI, doesn’t think that will automatically be the case.

Grayson, a former practising solicitor said: “While we agree with some of what the SRA is proposing it’s not as straightforward as it appears. While you cannot argue with the time, effort and input that’s gone into the latest consultation document, what you can argue with, is the likely outcomes given our anecdotal evidence from insurers.

“Some have indicated it’s unlikely their premiums will change if the limit goes down and most likely not at the lower end of the scale. Some insurers have said if there’s a minimum of £500,000 they may not offer that minimum, instead keeping the cover at the current levels, because reducing the cover creates a risk for them of the business going bust with the insurer becoming exposed to even greater risk.  Overall, the view in the insurance market is these proposals will have little or no effect on costs.

“Our advice is all firms need to be prepared and seek the right advice on the effects of the proposals. Ultimately we’re all about ensuring lawyers understand risk and can manage it better than they’re doing because actually that’s the main thing that does drive price down.”

 

If you’d like to discuss this and your PII requirements in more detail, please contact:

Gillian Anderson

Gillian.anderson@qpilegal.co.uk

0151 705 1673

 

Claire Campos

Claire.campos@qpilegal.co.uk

0151 705 1674

Want to have your say? Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read more stories

Join nearly 5,000 other practitioners – sign up to our free newsletter

You’ll receive the latest updates, analysis, and best practice straight to your inbox.

Features